This is my figure:
As far as its features, style components, and aesthetic, it is difficult for to know where to start, as I have never done close examination of artistic artifacts before -- but here goes:
The figure appears to be carved wood. I would describe its features as detailed yet minimalist. The head and neck of the female figure are both enlarged and elongated; its torso is elongated and thin, and its hands are seemingly featureless. What appears to be a coiffure is textured with parallel lines. Its legs seem short and its hips wide, even as the figure appears to stand in a squatting position.
As far as the face goes, the nose and nasal ridge seem to protrude exceedingly. The figure appears to be sporting a nose ring. The eyes, though small, are distinguished as the only lighter-colored feature on the statuette.
The breasts and belly-button are conical, and while the breasts are proportionally small, the belly-button seems proportionally large. Both are adorned with convex dot-markings, which the Metropolitan Museum of Art explained could refer to “scarification marks once made to beautify adolescent Bamana women.”
An interesting feature is the v-shaped indentation between the legs, which seems to refer to something involving reproduction.
Two ankles and 1 wrist are adorned with red beaded bracelets, but it is hard to tell from looking at it how of from what these were fashioned. The wristband looks like it was tied with some sort of hemp-like string, and the beads appear to be painted wood, but I cannot be completely sure.
Overall, the figure seems very idealized. I look forward to finding more explanations about the various features.
I have chosen to compare my figure to the following figure, found at the Metropolitan Museum of Art:
A great deal of information about the piece was gleaned from its description: http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/1978.412.347
Materialistically, the two objects seem quite different, as mine is completely wooden and this one seems to be partly metal (perhaps only the nose ring?); in any case, the two woods are of a different texture and coloration. The postures of the two are different; the Met's figure seems to be standing taller and more prominently than the seemingly more-relaxed figure I am studying. The coiffure on the Met's figure seems more detailedly decorated, the eyes protrude, and the nasal ridge is thinner. The hands and feet are extremely large and prominent, in very stark contrast to the hands and feet on my figure. The scarification markings and breasts on both, though, are similar. In general, I would call the Met's figure more elaborate and less minimalist than mine; yet the Met figure lacks the variety of the added colored jewelry.
In terms of sources that I plan to use during my research, I have begun compiling the following list:
- Art of the Bamana of Mali, by George A. Corbin
http://siris-libraries.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=13169MF92K147.80103&profile=liball&source=~!silibraries&view=subscriptionsummary&uri=full=3100001~!510238~!2&ri=4&aspect=subtab103&menu=search&ipp=20&spp=20&staffonly=&term=Bamana.+aat&index=PSUBJ&uindex=&aspect=subtab103&menu=search&ri=4&limitbox_1=LA01+=+Englis
- Sculpture of the Bamana, by Kate Ezra
http://siris-libraries.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=1N16988EF1805.81410&profile=liball&source=~!silibraries&view=subscriptionsummary&uri=full=3100001~!527597~!5&ri=2&aspect=subtab103&menu=search&ipp=20&spp=20&staffonly=&term=Bamana.+aat&index=PSUBJ&uindex=&aspect=subtab103&menu=search&ri=2&limitbox_1=LA01+=+English
- The Bamana World, by Pascal James Imperato
http://siris-libraries.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=1N16988EF1805.81410&profile=liball&source=~!silibraries&view=subscriptionsummary&uri=full=3100001~!757994~!6&ri=2&aspect=subtab103&menu=search&ipp=20&spp=20&staffonly=&term=Bamana.+aat&index=PSUBJ&uindex=&aspect=subtab103&menu=search&ri=2&limitbox_1=LA01+=+English- A Human Ideal in African Art: Bamana Figurative Sculpture, by Kate Ezra
I intend for this list to expand as I learn more about this subject.